Did Biden Make a Fatal Error with Netanyahu? Ro Khanna Spills!

Joe Biden finds himself entangled in controversy, with accusations of a “strategic mistake” looming large. Reports suggest that his close association with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu during the conflict with Hamas has sparked criticism, notably from leading congressional progressive Democrat, Ro Khanna.

In a recent interview on the One Decision podcast, Khanna, a prominent figure from California and a former Biden campaign surrogate, expressed concerns about Biden’s approach to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Khanna labeled Biden’s support of Netanyahu’s actions as a “bear-hug,” criticizing the Israeli leader for his conduct during the conflict with Hamas in Gaza.

Khanna’s remarks shed light on the unease within certain segments of the American population, particularly among Arab American communities. He highlighted a growing sentiment of opposition to the Biden administration’s stance on Israel, indicating a broader dissatisfaction with US-Israel relations.

The congressman emphasized the need for Biden to assert clearer consequences for Netanyahu’s actions, urging a recalibration of the US approach to the Israeli government. Khanna argued for a more assertive stance from Biden, advocating for measures such as withholding weapons transfers and recognizing a Palestinian state.

The interview also touched upon the dynamics of US-Israel relations, with Khanna questioning Netanyahu’s behavior in relation to Biden’s warnings. He underscored the disparity in power dynamics between the two leaders, emphasizing America’s status as a global superpower and its significant influence over Israel.Khanna’s critique extended to the domestic political implications of Biden’s Israel policy, particularly in the context of potential protest votes and electoral repercussions. While expressing confidence in Biden’s electoral prospects, Khanna acknowledged the discontent brewing within segments of the Democratic base, especially among young people, progressives, and voters of color.

The congressman cautioned against underestimating the significance of this discontent, citing historical parallels and potential challenges for the Democratic Party’s electoral coalition. He referenced the unrest surrounding the 1968 Democratic convention in Chicago, drawing parallels to the current political climate and the need for internal cohesion within the party.

In response to the interview, Biden’s administration has yet to issue an official statement. However, the remarks from Khanna, a key figure within the Democratic Party, underscore the complexities of navigating US-Israel relations and the challenges inherent in balancing domestic and international interests.

As tensions persist in the Middle East and scrutiny mounts over Biden’s handling of the crisis, the fallout from these developments could have far-reaching implications for US foreign policy and domestic politics. The coming weeks and months are likely to witness further debates and discussions surrounding America’s role in the region and its relationship with key allies like Israel.